Dual-task interference across practice: reductions in task 2 slowing

Paper presented at the 4th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Association for Interdisciplinary Learning, Hood River, Oregon.

Mark Van Selst, Eric Ruthruff, James C. Johnston


When subjects attempt to perform two speeded discrimination tasks in in rapid succession, performance on the second discrimination is often strikingly impaired. It has previously been reported that extended practice yields only a minimal decrease in the amount of Task 2 slowing. In contrast, we found that Task 2 slowing decreases dramatically for all six subjects across 40 sessions of practice. In one experiment we demonstrate that this reduction in interference does not occur when the tasks use the same response modality. Two additional experiments investigating transfer demonstrate that dual-task interference remains small when a new (unpracticed) Task 2 is used, but returns to baseline when a new Task 1 is used. We conclude that the main cause of the changes that occur with extended practice is a drastic shortening of bottleneck stages in Task 1.

Practice Drastically Reduces interference in the Psychological Refractory Paradigm

Paper presented at the 28th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Pittsburgh.

Mark Van Selst, Eric Ruthruff, James C. Johnston


Six subjects were given 36 sessions of practice in a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm. Task 1 required vocal responses, while Task 2 required manual responses. Unlike previous experiments with two manual response tasks, practice dramatically reduced the size of the PRP interference, from an initial 353 msec to only 40 msec. Analysis of factor interactions support a central bottleneck model of Task 2 postponement both early and late in practice.